Southern California Attorney Directory Review

Socallawsupport.com creation only Attorney Directory focused exclusively on California Attorneys has recently been completed and brought to Attorneys. The objective of the brand new attorney directory is 2 fold first it allows consumers trying to find legal help locate an attorney conveniently located on their work or home. Second it offers attorneys an affordable way to get local experience of prospective clients. Features of the brand new directory incorporate a map, which displays the locations of attorneys in your community the consumer is searching. The consumer can then search by legal category to discover the form of attorney they are seeking.

 

The best thing about this attorney directory is that it was made and of an attorney plus an web page developer which are focused on increasing the customer experience. Their goal was to really make it highly functional, clean, responsive, and fairly priced so that attorneys could get a website. After at least a year of development the ultimate product has achieved each their set goals and is expected to be widely accepted by consumers and attorneys in California.

 

The conventional clutter connected with directory sites has become eliminated. You do not be depressed by ads or gimmicks that should side track the customer. Consumers are certain to get exactly what they’re trying to find whenever they reach this site, an attorney to assist them using legal situation. And attorneys can be assured that local consumers searching for their helps will discover them rather than sidetracked by annoying ads on the spot.  An example of an attorney featured listing are available here Law Offices of Kevin Cortright.

 

Socallawsupport will ended up being the local resource for California consumers searching for legal counsel.

New Personal Injury Claims Report for European Countries

A new report has recently been released concerning Personal Injury Awards in EU and EFTA Countries.  This new report has been produced after some more research was conducted by the authors and they are now on their 3rd edition of this popular legal report.  The guide itself is very in-depth and includes an overview of the personal injury awards system across Europe.  Whether you are based in the European Union (EU) or the European Free Trading Area (EFTA) and work in a legal practice specialising in personal injury claims, this report should be an essential read.

It goes into a lot of detail of all the changes to the law that have occurred over the last decade and looks at how compensation is awarded to people in the different countries.  It also goes onto lay out some recommended advice for any lawyers wanting to know how changes in the law could affect their working practices.  Whilst the report is quite expensive at over three hundred Euros it does include the kind of comparison charts and research that you won’t find online – and has been at the forefront of this information since the first edition was released all the way back in 1994 when personal injury law was still really in its infancy when compared to the industry it is today.

Many legal websites have already started to review the report, and so far most of the online comments have been very positive.  For example, these personal injury lawyers in London said the following on their blog:

“Without doubt one of the first reports we ever reach to when we need clarification on the law when applied over country borders and boundaries” – Independent Personal Injury Lawyers in London (read more) – 3rd November 2013

With that kind of comments coming in, it’s no wonder that the report has been slated to be best seller in 2014.  If you are specialist in personal injury and are going to be working on claims that might need to go to court and jurisdiction in a country other than you own then it really is an invaluable guide.  You can purchase it from most of the top legal resource document libraries today or can read a quick synopsis of the content on one of those sites also.

Settlement: $1.3 Million Wages And Hours Class Action Settlement With Madison Square Garden Security Officers

Home > Settlements > $1.3 Million Wages and Hours Class Action Settlement with Madison Square Garden Security Officers
$1.3 Million Wages and Hours Class Action Settlement with Madison Square Garden Security Officers
January 3 2011
New York, NY: More than 300 employees will receive $1.3 million from Madison Square Garden in a settlement agreement filed today in federal court. The settlement will bring to an end a class action lawsuit brought in federal court in Manhattan in 2009 by four security officers claiming that since 2003 Madison Square Garden willfully failed to pay its security officers time and a half for all the overtime they worked.
The settlement will bring money to 305 current and former Garden employees based on their undercompensated overtime work.
Legal Help
If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please fill in the form to the right.
Request Legal Help

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/1-3-million-wages-hours-class-action-settlement.html?ref=rss

Settlement: Ameriprise Agrees Preliminary Settlement In Securities America Investor Class Action

Home > Settlements > Ameriprise Agrees Preliminary Settlement in Securities America Investor Class Action
Ameriprise Agrees Preliminary Settlement in Securities America Investor Class Action
April 13 2011
New York, NY: A preliminary settlement has been reached by Ameriprise Financial and its brokerage unit, Securities America Inc, and clients who allege in they lost roughly $400 million on fraudulent private placements.
The preliminary agreement would see Securities America pay $80 million, further to a separate agreement in which SA has agreed to pay $70 million. If approved, the settlement would mean a recovery of 40 cents on the dollar, after fees.
If approved, the majority of the settlement will be paid by Ameriprise.
Legal Help
If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please fill in the form to the right.
Request Legal Help

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/ameriprise-agrees-preliminary-settlement-in.html?ref=rss

Law Suit Filed: Lawsuit Filed Against Legacy Health Care Facilities For Nursing Home Abuse

Home > Lawsuits > Lawsuit Filed Against Legacy Health Care Facilities for Nursing Home Abuse
Lawsuit Filed Against Legacy Health Care Facilities for Nursing Home Abuse
October 29 2010
Buffalo, NY: A class action lawsuit alleging nursing home abuse has been filed against Legacy Health Care on behalf of all residents who resided at Legacy facility from at least 2007 to the present, citing neglect and endangerment to the welfare of residents. Legacy Health Care operates numerous elderly care facilities including Ridge View Manor LLC, Williamsville Suburban LLC, Williamsville View Manor Nursing Home, and Sheridan Manor. Richard Zacher, owner and administrator of the named facilities, is also listed as a defendant in the case, as are John Doe 1-200, which includes agents or employees of the above-mentioned facilities.
The civil lawsuit was filed against the nursing home chain on behalf of plaintiffs due to alleged deprivation of rights and benefits to which residents were legally entitled. Among the causes of action brought in this lawsuit, the named defendants are accused of failing to ensure a dignified existence for residents, inadequate staffing, and quality of care issues.
Legacy Health Care Facilities and those named under their umbrella are also accused of fraud, breach of contract and negligence. The complaint states that defendants have violated Section 2801-d of the Public Health Law by failing to staff facilities with adequate and qualified personnel to care for residents, compromising dignity of residents and quality of care. Plaintiffs’ complaint also claims breach of contract, as individual plaintiffs entered into contracts with defendants in return for health care services for related residents.
Questions raised by plaintiffs in this complaint relate to fraudulent conduct by defendants, failure to employ sufficient staff to properly care for residents, engagement in unfair or deceptive conduct in regards to administration, management and operation of facilities, and failure of defendants to support and advance environments that provide dignity and proper quality of care to residents.
Legacy Health Care Facilities Nursing Home Abuse Legal Help
If you or a loved one has suffered damages in this case, please fill in the form to the right and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
Last updated November 24 2010
Request Legal Help

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/legacy-health-care-facilities-nursing-home-abuse.html?ref=rss

Settlement: Negligent Treatment Of Bedsores Results In $315k Verdict

What are you looking for?
Home Page >> Settlements >> Negligent Treatment of Bedsores Results in $315K Verdict
Negligent Treatment of Bedsores Results in $315K Verdict
Miami, FL: The family of an 88-year old woman who underwent treatment for a Stage IV sacral pressure sore which the family allege was negligently performed and led to their mother’s death, have been awarded $315 thousand in their medical negligence lawsuit.
The surgery was done through Vohra Health Services, a wound care company that treated residents at Miami Gardens Care Center. The woman’s daughter alleged in her lawsuit, that the doctor involved negligently performed a surgical debridement by failing to remove all the necrotic tissue from the wound. The daughter further alleged that the surgery and post-operative care from the nurse involved caused her mother’s death. Notably, the counsel for the defense counsel also blamed Miami Gardens for the worsening of the woman’s bed sore.
The jury found the physician 65 percent liable, the nurse 25 percent liable and Miami Gardens, as a Fabre defendant, 10 percent liable.
Legal Help
If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please click the link below.

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/medical-negligence-bedsore-treatment-miami-gardens.html?ref=rss

Law Suit Filed: Bmw Faces Defective Alloy Wheels Class Action Lawsuit

Home > Lawsuits > BMW Faces Defective Alloy Wheels Class Action Lawsuit
BMW Faces Defective Alloy Wheels Class Action Lawsuit
May 15 2013
San Francisco, CA: A defective products class action lawsuit has been filed against BMW North America LLC alleging the alloy wheels used in 2007-2012 BMW Z4 sports cars are prone to cracking, making them a safety hazard. Additionally, they are expensive to repair.
Filed by Barry Jekowsky, the lawsuit, entitled Jekowsky v. BMW of North America LLC, Case No. 13-cv-02158, US District Court for the Northern District of California, states that BMW “knowingly and purposefully failed to disclose to consumers that the BMW alloy wheels had an unreasonably short lifespan and would require far more frequent replacement than reasonable consumers would expect.” Further, the complaint alleges that despite BMW knowing of the defective alloy wheels, the company continued to install them on the vehicles and failed to include them in its four-year/50,000 mile warranty.
Jekowski claims his vehicle’s alloy wheels suffered two cracks within the initial year of leasing a new 2011 BMW Z4. On both occasions the wheel and tire damage was not covered by the warranty, resulting in his paying approximately $2,000 out of pocket to repair the defective products. He further claims that had he known about the problem with the alloy wheels in advance of leasing the BMW Z4 sports car, he would purchased the vehicle with different wheels, or not paid the price he had for the existing product.
The lawsuit is filed on behalf of all current and former owners and lessees of a 2007-2012 BMW Z4 vehicle that either came equipped with alloy wheels or who had them installed after purchase. Plaintiffs are represented by Mark Andrew Chavez of Chavez & Gertler LLP.
BMW Faces Defective Alloy Wheels Class Action Legal Help
If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please fill in the form to the right and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
Request Legal Help

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/bmw-defective-alloy-wheels-class-action-lawsuit-bmw.html?ref=rss

Possible Case: Stryker And Fda Issue Class 1 Recall Of Oasys Midline Occiput Plate

Home > Investigations > Stryker and FDA Issue Class 1 Recall of OASYS Midline Occiput Plate
Stryker and FDA Issue Class 1 Recall of OASYS Midline Occiput Plate
August 29 2013
Washington, DC: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Stryker have notified healthcare professionals of a class 1 recall of the Stryker Spine: OASYS Midline Occiput Plate. Stryker has received reports indicating post-operative fracture of the pin that connects the tulip head to the plate body. This may cause serious adverse health consequences including blood loss, nerve injury, and the need for revision surgery to replace the fractured implant. Patients may experience symptoms including pain, weakness, or numbness.
The OASYS Midline Occiput Plate is part of the OASYS Occipito-Cervico-Thoracic System used to promote fusion of the cervical spine and occipito-cervico-thoracic junction (Occiput ??” T3). The OASYS Midline Occiput Plate provides stabilization at the junction between the occipital bone and the vertebrae in the cervical spine.
The affected products were distributed from April 23, 2010, through February 12, 2013.
On May 30, 2013, Stryker issued an Urgent Medical Device Recall requesting medical facilities to examine their inventory and immediately stop distributing or using the recalled lots. If a medical facility has the affected product in stock, it should be returned to Stryker.
On June 20, 2013, Stryker notified spinal implant surgeons recommending routine clinical and radiographic post-operative evaluation for patients with an implanted OASYS Midline plate.
Legal Help
If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please fill in the form to the right and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
Request Legal Help

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/stryker-fda-issue-class-1-recall-of-oasys-midline.html?ref=rss

After Becoming A Us Citizen, Is There A Timeframe Before I…

 
Ask a Confidential Question
In order to get private confidential legal advice from a licensed attorney in your location, simply enter your legal question with all relevant information below, and click the “Ask Question” button when ready. The next steps will allow to you Attorney in French Valley to select which attorneys will be able to review and answer your question.

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawguru.com/legal-questions/new-york-family-divorce-custody-adoption/citizen-timeframe-man-married-nonus-410353475/

Settlement: Worker Awarded $9 Million For Workplace Injuries

What are you looking for?
Home Page >> Settlements >> Worker Awarded $9 Million for Workplace Injuries
Worker Awarded $9 Million for Workplace Injuries
Madison, IL: An injured CSX Transportation conductor has been awarded $9 million as http://attorney-in-temecula.com/more-information/workers-compensation/ settlement of his workplace injury suit.
Richard Burden, of Owensboro, KY, was hurt in 2007 while releasing vertical handbrakes on a tank car at night. As he dismounted the car, he fell and sustained a fractured leg, a neck injury, which required surgery at three disc levels, a low back injury and a traumatic brain injury. As a result of his injuries Burden had not been able to work and had been adjudicated totally unemployable.
Legal Help
If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please click the link below.

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/csx-transportation-conductor-lawsuit-settlement.html?ref=rss

Law Suit Filed: Jpmorgan Chase Accused Of Fraud In Bankruptcy Filings

What are you looking for?
Home Page >> Lawsuits Filed >> Lawsuit: JPMorgan Chase Accused of Fraud in Bankruptcy Filings
JPMorgan Chase Accused of Fraud in Bankruptcy Filings
Please click here for a free evaluation of your claim
Newport Beach, CA: A consumer fraud class action filed against JPMorgan Chase alleges the bank routinely fabricated documents to deceive bankruptcy judges.
The lawsuit, filed by Ernest Michael Bakenie, states “Through the use of fabricated assignments, endorsements and affidavits that purport to transfer deeds of trust, notes and the rights to all monies due under the terms of tens of thousands of non-negotiable promissory notes (the ‘MLNs’); Chase has demonstrated a pattern and practice of playing ‘hide-and-seek’ with debtors, judges and other bankruptcy players.”
Bakenie further claims that Chase’s “pattern and practice of playing ‘hide-and-seek’ with debtors, judges and other bankruptcy players” resulted in the bank securing motions for relief of stay and proofs of claim in 95 percent of its cases. According to the lawsuit, an extensive network of attorneys working for Chase filed more than 7,000 motions for relief from automatic stay in bankruptcy cases in the Central District of California, “wherein they falsely claim to be the party entitled to monies due under the terms of MLNs.” The lawsuit also claims that Chase rewards attorneys based on how quickly they can secure the stays, and uses fabricated documents to establish chain of title on loans.
Essentially, the lawsuit claims, “Rather than incur the cost of ‘proving up’ its own standing or the standing of its principal Mortgage Backed Security Trust, Chase systemically misrepresents Chase or a designated MBST to be a creditor in tens of thousands of bankruptcy cases by utilizing manufactured documents. ”
The lawsuit also claims “That said practice allows Chase to dump defaulted loans that were never properly securitized by Washington Mutual (WAMU) and other originators acquired by Chase into private mortgage backed security trusts by creating the illusion of a valid transfer. Said practice shifts the liability of defaulted loans not properly securitized by WAMU, from Chase to private mortgage backed security trusts. The practice allows Chase to effectively mitigate the millions of dollars in liability of the WAMU acquisition, where WAMU failed to transfer MLNs of its portfolio before its demise. Said practice shifts losses from WAMU to MBST bond investors.”
Bakenie seeks class certification, compensatory, statutory and punitive damages for unfair and deceptive trade, disgorgement and “an order vacating all bankruptcy orders, claims and awards granted based on Chase’s misrepresentation and deceptive business practices”.
Chase http://bankruptcy-software.com Bankruptcy Fraud Class Action Legal Help
If you or a loved one has suffered damages in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.

For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/jpmorgan-chase-fraud-bankruptcy-filings-lawsuit.html?ref=rss